Timo Laven
After graduating from high school in 2015, Timo Laven began studying law at the University of Cologne in 2015. He completed his major in criminology in February 2021, after passing the state exam in March 2020. During his studies, he grew interested in public law, especially constitutional law and the points of contact between law and politics.
Since January 2020, he worked as a student assistant for Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Haferkamp at the Institute for Modern History of Private Law, German and Rhenish Legal History. Confronted more intensively with research in legal history for the first time, the desire to conduct research on recent constitutional history in his own dissertation arose there. Since June 2021, he has been working as a research assistant at the Academy for European Human Rights Protection and is doing his doctorate on a constitutional law topic with legal historical and interdisciplinary connections.
In May 2024 Timo started his legal traineeship (Rechtsreferendariat) at the Cologne Court of Appeal.
Areas of research
- Constitutional law
- Legal History
- Political Theory
- Social Rights
Current research project
Currently, Timo is working on his dissertation on the topic "Between Socialism and Welfare State? Emergence and Reception of Article 15 of the Basic Law".
Description
Between Socialism and Welfare State? Emergence and Reception of Article 15 of the Basic Law
For the first time since the commencement of the Basic Law, the initiative "Deutsche Wohnen & Co. Enteignen!", socialisation of private property seems to be becoming a realistic political reality. The instrument of socialisation has its legal basis in Article 15 of the Basic Law, according to which "land, natural resources and means of production [...] may be transferred to common ownership or other forms of common economy for the purpose of socialisation [...]". After being in oblivion for 70 years, the provision was now resurrected from its dormancy.
The awakening marked the beginning of a discussion in a multitude of expert opinions and essays in which ideologies clashed: Is this an intervention in property, similar to expropriation under Article 14 (3) of the Basic Law? Or is it a "norm of openness" that is supposed to enable the freedom of the many, even a collective fundamental right to socialisation? These questions show that it is not only ideologies that are brought to the surface by Article 15 of the Basic Law, but also fundamental questions of constitutional theory. These lie at such a distance from each other that there is often a lack of understanding for the opposite side.
This is where the dissertation aims to begin by providing explanations from a historical perspective. In the first part, which deals with the history of the origins of the constitution, it is outlined which ideas and interests, beginning with the labour movement and the Weimar debates on socialisation and ending with the enactment of the regional constitutions, found their way into the Parliamentary Council. In the second part, the whole literature on Article 15 of the Basic Law is reviewed and contextualised. The provision functions as a magnifying glass for the development of constitutional and, in particular, fundamental rights dogmatics since 1949. In the politically charged current debate, the aim is to create the possibility for mutual understanding and the finding of appropriate solutions for the present.
Publications
Book Chapters
- (together with Lorenz Wielenga), Rassismuskritik oder Beleidigung? Entzug der Lehrerlaubnis wegen polizeikritischer Äußerung, in: v. Auer u.a., Grundrechte-Report 2024, Frankfurt a.M. 2024, S. Fischer, S. 101-105
Journal articles
- (together with Laura Jäckel & Yannick Schoog) Referendarexamensklausur – Öffentliches Recht: Verfassungsrecht – Finanzspritze für parteinahe Stiftungen, JuS, 2024, Heft 3, S. 256- 262
- Vergesellschaftung als Selbstzweck? Die Anwendbarkeit des Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatzes auf Art. 15 GG, in: Kritische Justiz 56 (2023), 313
Blogpost
- (together with Georg Freiß), Vergesellschaftungsverzögerungsgesetz, Teil 2 zum wegweisenden Abschlussbericht der Berliner Expert*innenkommission, Verfassungsblog, 07.07.2023.
- (together with Lorenz Wielenga), Über den Umgang mit Bahar Aslan: Die verbogene Hufeisentheorie, Junge Wissenschaft im Öffentlichen Recht, 15.06.2023
- (together with Lorenz Wielenga), Über den Umgang mit Bahar Aslan: Die disziplinar- und strafrechtliche Lage, Junge Wissenschaft im Öffentlichen Recht, 14.06.2023
- (together with Georg Freiß), Entgleisung des Bundesrechnungshofs. Über die Zerschlagung der Deutschen Bahn AG und das politisches Mandat der Bundesbehörde, Verfassungsblog, 24.3.2023
- (together with Laura Jäckel & Yannick Schoog), Die Quadratur des parteipolitischen Kreises, JuWissBlog Nr. 8/2023 v. 14.3.2023
- Die „Sozialisierungskommission“ in Berlin – Ein rechtshistorisches Déjà-vu?, JuWissBlog Nr. 25/2022 v. 28.4.2022
- Ein Hoffnungsschimmer, aber kein grünes Licht für Vergesellschaftung Berliner Wohnungsunternehmen, Verfassungsblog, 22.12.2022
Reviews
- Wege zur Rechtsgeschichte: Gerichtsbarkeit und Verfahren (= UTB 4295), in: Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Germanistische Abteilung (ZRGG) 138 (2021), S. 390-392.
Timo Laven
Research Assistant
address
Kerpener Str. 30
50937 Köln